When asked about a supreme court case other than Roe v. Wade, Palin seems to draw a blank. And then gives a nonsense answer. When I first told my wife about this interview, she immediately said "What about Brown v. Board of Education?" Then I was talking to my neighbor (a McCain supporter) and he said "What about Miranda?" So either I have a bunch of Supreme Court scholars living on my block, or maybe perhaps Palin should have been able to come up with something. The Dred Scott case anyone?